Quick takeaways
- Use the glossary to align terms before debating tools or architecture.
- Definitions here are practical, not academic.
- When in doubt, tie the term back to a real workflow or decision.
AI terms and concepts explained
Gaurav Sen explains 20 core AI concepts in 40 minutes — tokenization, prompting, RAG, vector databases, MCP, and agents — in the same plain-English style as this glossary.
Glossary terms
The terms below are grouped by how deep you need to go to use them. Beginner terms are useful in almost every AI conversation. Intermediate terms matter once you start building workflows. Advanced terms become relevant when you design RAG, agents, or evaluation systems.
Beginner terms
Intermediate terms
Advanced terms
How to use this glossary
Use the glossary before projects, vendor reviews, and team training. If a discussion is getting abstract, point back to the workflow: what is the input, what is the expected output, and where does human review happen?
- When you hear an unfamiliar term, look it up here first.
- Ask how the term connects to your workflow before investing in it.
- Share the definition with teammates to keep conversations aligned.
- Update the glossary when your team adopts new patterns or tools.
Without AI vs. with AI
| Task | Without AI | With AI |
|---|---|---|
| Term alignment | Teams argue over words like agent, RAG, and eval without shared definitions. | The glossary gives plain-English definitions tied to real workflows so conversations start aligned. |
| Onboarding | New hires search the web and get inconsistent or academic explanations. | The glossary provides practical definitions written for founders, developers, and marketers. |
| Vendor discussions | Sales teams use jargon that technical reviewers interpret differently. | The glossary lets teams point to a shared definition before debating tools or architecture. |
| Decision clarity | Leaders approve projects without understanding model limits or review gates. | The glossary defines concepts like hallucination, context window, and review gate in decision terms. |
| Cross-functional work | Marketing, product, and engineering use the same word to mean different things. | The glossary creates a shared reference that reduces miscommunication across teams. |
FAQ
Is this glossary technical?
Only as much as it needs to be. The focus is on practical understanding for real work.
What should I read after the glossary?
Start with prompt engineering, then move to RAG, MCP, and agents depending on your workflow.
Do I need to know every term?
No. Learn the terms that show up in the workflows you are actually building.
How is this different from other AI glossaries?
These definitions tie each term to a workflow decision, not just a theory concept.
Can I share this with my team?
Yes. Use it as a shared reference before architecture reviews or vendor calls.
Should beginners start with advanced terms?
No. Start with beginner terms and only move deeper when a workflow actually requires it.
Is this AI glossary technical?
Only as much as needed for real decisions. The focus is practical understanding, not academic depth.
What should I learn after the glossary?
Start with prompt engineering, then move to RAG, MCP, agents, and evaluation based on your workflow.
Do I need to memorize every term?
No. Learn the terms that appear in the workflows you are actually building.
How is this glossary different from others?
Definitions are tied to workflows, decisions, and review gates rather than pure theory.